Metalinguistic Awareness and L2 English Reading Comprehension among Pakistani Undergraduates: The Predictive Roles of Morphological and Syntactic Awareness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt2314Keywords:
Metalinguistic Awareness, Syntactic Awareness, Morphological Awareness, Reading Comprehension, Urdu-Speaking Learners, Quantitative Design, Grammaticality Judgement TaskAbstract
This study examined the extent to which morphological awareness (MA) and syntactic awareness (SA) predict English reading comprehension among Pakistani Urdu-speaking undergraduates, after controlling for receptive vocabulary. A quantitative, cross-sectional, correlational design was employed. Data were collected from 112 participants through an online test battery delivered via Google Form, consisting of four instruments: a background questionnaire, a 25-item receptive vocabulary test (Vocabulary Levels Test), a 20-item derivational MA task, a 20-item grammaticality judgement task for SA, and a 10-item reading comprehension test. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation to examine bivariate relationships, and a two-step hierarchical multiple regression to determine the unique and joint predictive contributions of MA and SA. Results showed that both MA and SA correlated positively with reading comprehension. However, after controlling for vocabulary, SA emerged as the stronger unique predictor (sr² = .065, p = .001), while MA did not reach statistical significance (p = .056) in the full model. The findings suggest that for Urdu-L1 learners, syntactic awareness plays an especially important role in academic reading, possibly due to typological differences between Urdu (SOV) and English (SVO). The study recommends explicit syntax instruction in Pakistani university English programs.
References
Alshehri, M. G., & Zhang, D. (2022). The lexical basis of second language reading comprehension: From (sub)lexical knowledge to processing efficiency. Language Learning, 72(4), 1021–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12478
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Gaux, C., & Gombert, J. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit syntactic knowledge and reading in pre-adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 169–188.
Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., & Reynolds, D. (2021). Unraveling adolescent language and reading comprehension: The monster’s data. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(1), 1–25.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults' reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159–183.
Halo, L. A., Muhammad, N., & Rustamani, S. (2024). Exploring language-related challenges of Pakistani students in English medium instruction (EMI) programs. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(3), 197–206.
The jamovi project. (2022). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Ke, S., Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2023). Metalinguistic awareness in second language reading development. Cambridge University Press.
Kotzer, M., Kirby, J., & Heggie, L. (2021). Morphological awareness predicts reading comprehension in adults. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 269–291.
Lee, J., Wolters, A., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). The relations of morphological awareness with language and literacy skills vary depending on orthographic depth and nature of morphological awareness. Review of Educational Research, 92(4), 528–570.
Liu, Y., Groen, M. A., & Cain, K. (2024). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 42, Article 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press.
Ramzan, M., & Alahmadi, A. (2024). Effect of syntax instruction on the development of complex sentences in ESL writing. Social Science Review Archives, 2(1), 1–14.
Sarbazi, M., Khany, R., & Shoja, L. (2021). The predictive power of vocabulary, syntax, and metacognitive strategies for L2 reading comprehension. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 39(2), 147–162.
Satori, M. (2025). The role of morphological knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Second Language Studies, 43(1). University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
Schmidt, R. L. (1999). Urdu: An essential grammar. Routledge.
Sparks, E., & Metsala, J. (2023). Morphological awareness predicts reading comprehension in first-grade students. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1089254.
Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2021). Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312000025X
Sun, B., Hu, G., & Curdt-Christiansen, X. (2020). Metalinguistic contribution to reading comprehension: A comparison of Primary 3 students from China and Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(6), 1403–1434.
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69.
Zaka, M., Tahir, A., Bibi, S., & Abbas, A. (2026). Decoding sentences: The impact of syntax awareness on reading comprehension of EFL learners in Pakistani universities. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 7(1), 45–62.
Zhang, D. (2021). Morphological knowledge in second language reading comprehension: Examining mediation through vocabulary knowledge and lexical inferencing. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 563–581.
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1193–1216.
Zhang, H., & Lin, C.-H. (2021). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Does it work equally for L2 learners with different L1 backgrounds? Reading and Writing, 34(7), 1779–1804.
Zhang, J., Lin, T., Liu, Y., & Nagy, W. (2020). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Differential mediation mechanisms in native English speakers, fluent English learners, and limited English learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 194, Article 104822.
Zhou, J. (2022). The effects of syntactic awareness on L2 Chinese passage-level reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 783827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783827
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
