CONCEPTUAL COGNITION IN PASHTO POETRY: A COGNITIVE STYLISTIC MAPPING OF CONSTRUAL IN THE POEMS OF SAHIB SHAH SABIR

Authors

  • Muhammad Noman Khan MPhil, Applied Linguistics, English Language Assessment Specialist Home Languages Center, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt2264

Keywords:

Cognitive stylistics, conceptual construal, Pashto poetry, Sahib Shah Sabir.

Abstract

Poetry has always been considered as an aesthetic activity, however; cognitive linguistics and stylistics show that it is a highly organized thinking process. This paper explores the poetry of Sahib Shah Sabir as a system of conceptual cognition in the context of cognitive stylistics, based on the main theories in cognitive linguistics through the construction of meaning by the five main dimensions of construal: Perspective, Negation, Metacognition, Prominence, and Force Dynamics. The study combines mixed methods, allowing to employ qualitative close reading, visual modeling, and quantitative analysis of twenty selected poems. The findings show that the poetry of Sahib Shah Sabir is a dynamic cognitive system that creates experience, resistance, epistemic power, and revolution. This piece of work aims in contributing to the field of cognitive stylistics by extending its practice to Pashto poetry, making Sabir a conceptual poet and broadening the domain of cognitive poetics beyond Western literary discourse.

References

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489

Brône, G., & Vandaele, J. (Eds.). (2009). Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 10). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213379

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842

Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/Cognitive_Linguistics.html?id=ex8mgGh_3KIC&redir_esc=y

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7594119M/

Freeman, M. H. (2012). Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in cognitive poetics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0045

Freeman, M. H. (2012). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a cognitive theory of literature. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 253–282). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.253

Gavins, J., & Steen, G. (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417737

Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805214/19659/sample/9780521419659ws.pdf

Hakemulder, F., van Peer, W., & Zyngier, S. (Eds.). (2007). Muses and measures: Empirical research methods for the humanities. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.65325/EB2882/muses-measures-frank-hakemulder-sonia-zyngier-willie-van-peer

Herman, D. (2002). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. University of Nebraska Press. https://cdn-cms.f-static.net/uploads/4603385/normal_6001b426710c3.pdf

Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762949

Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2025). Stylistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108603232

Katz, A. N., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R. W., & Turner, M. (Eds.). (1998). Figurative language and thought. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195109627.001.0001

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3637992.html

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3774967.html

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

McIntyre, D., & Walker, B. (2019). Corpus stylistics: Theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413220

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5

Rasse, C., Onysko, A., & Citron, F. M. M. (2020). Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 12(2), 310–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.47

Riazi, A. M., & Amini Farsani, M. (2024). Mixed methods research in applied linguistics: Charting the progress through the second decade of the twenty first century. Language Teaching, 57(2), 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000332

Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7488810M/Cognitive_Poetics

Stockwell, P. (2007). Cognitive poetics and literary theory. Journal of Literary Theory, 36(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2007.008

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume I—Concept structuring systems. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001

Toolan, M. J. (1998). Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Language-in-Literature-1st-Edition/Toolan/p/book/9780203763537

Tsur, R. (2008). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics (2nd expanded & updated ed.). Sussex Academic Press. https://utpdistribution.com/9781845192556/toward-a-theory-of-cognitive-poetics/

Van Peer, W. (2008). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Routledge.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics/article/stylistics-and-psychology-investigations-of-foregrounding-willie-van-peer-london-croom-helm-1986-pp-220/4582B748B76BA4C344A5F8683D9358C6

Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Longman. https://textworldtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/text-worlds.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29