REGULAR PLURAL FORMATION IN URDU: A MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOSYNTACTIC ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Noor ul Sabah MPhil Scholar, Applied Linguistics, University of Central Punjab Lahore Author
  • Aisha Saleem (Corresponding author) Assistant Professor, Faculty of Languages and Literature, University of Central Punjab Lahore Author
  • Sahar Javaid MPhil Scholar, Applied Linguistics, University of Central Punjab Lahore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1970

Keywords:

Urdu, grammatical gender, morphological marking, plural formation, suffixation, syntactic agreement.

Abstract

This study explores regular plural marking for Urdu nouns․ In Urdu‚ plural marking is achieved with the addition of the suffix markers -ے (ay)‚ -وں (on)‚ -یاں (yaan)‚ and -یں (ain)․ In this study regular plural marking of regular nouns and regular plural markers is assumed to be a grammatical number agreement trigger at the sentence level․ The patterns of regular nouns in the three relevant factors of the language are complex (gender‚ phonological structure‚ case)․ Fifteen regular nouns were chosen as examples to test root maintenance‚ suffixing‚ vowel variation‚ and gender alternations․ Data were collected from dictionaries and published texts. The results indicate that plural formation in Urdu is systematic and predictable, governed by established morphological patterns. However, the phonological environment may introduce variation: masculine nouns ending in ا form their direct plural with -ے (ay) and oblique plural with -وں (on), feminine nouns ending in ی take -یاں (yaan), and those ending in a consonant take -یں (ain). These plural markers encode number features that extend beyond the word level, triggering feature agreement on verbs and adjectives at the sentence level.

References

Al-Athwary, A. A. (2015). On grammatical borrowing: the case of Arabic plurals in the Urdu language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1642–1651.

Amin, A., Javed, H., & Haroon, S. (2023). Functional Morphology: Patterns, Rules, and Sets for Morphological Parsing of Urdu Regular Verbs. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 207–216.

Ansari, N. A., & Mangrio, R. (2019). Morphology of Urdu Verbs: A word and paradigm approach. Pakistan Journal of Language Studies, 3(1), 31–42.

Bashir, R., Asif, S., & Saleem, A. (2020). Revisiting Lexeme-Based Theory's Word Formation Rules: Counter Evidence From Urdu. International Journal of Management, 11(9).

Bertyák, Á. (2021). Urban morphology: the classical and modern research methodologies. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 52(2), 135-145.

Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2007). Inflectional morphology. Language typology and syntactic description, 3(2), 169-240., J. (2007). Inflectional morphology. Language typology and syntactic description, 3(2), 169–240.

Habib, N. (2024). Urdu dependency parsing and treebank development: A syntactic and morphological perspective.

Hussain, S. (2004). Finite-state morphological analyzer for Urdu [CRULP report]. Centre for Research in Urdu Language Processing.

Iqbal, M., & Mangrio, D. R. A. (2025). The pluralization of the plurals in Urdu: An OT analysis. Balochistan Journal of Linguistics, 13.

Iqbal, M., & Mangrio, R. A. (2025). The Pluralization of the Plurals in Urdu: An OT Analysis. Balochistan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 14–14.

Kelly, D. H. (1966). The new linguistics and the teacher of Classics. Classical Journal, 247–251.

Khan, T. A. (2014). Automatic acquisition of Urdu nouns (along with gender and irregular plurals). In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). ACL Anthology.

Maqsood, B., Saleem, T., Aziz, A., & Azam, S. (2019). Grammatical constraints on the borrowing of nouns and verbs in urdu and english. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019853469.

Nabi, F. G., Sultan Ali Khan, B., & Saleem, T. (2025). The structure of inflected Urdu nominals: insights from Distributed Morphology. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2464383.

Niazi, A. (2016, April). Morphological Analysis of Urdu Verbs. In International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (pp. 284–293). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Nugraha, D. S. (2025). A Quantitative Analysis of Research Trends and Thematic Development in Derivational Morphology. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(4), 1787-1801.

Qureshi, A. H., Hassan, M. U., & Akhter, S. (2020). Towards description of derivation in Urdu: morphological perspective. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq, 3(2), 83–87.

Rizvi, S. M. J., & Hussain, M. (2005). Analysis, design, and implementation of an Urdu morphological analyzer. Student Conference on Engineering Sciences and Technology (SCONEST), 1–7. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7501973

Safdar, M. (2021). Derivational Morphology in Urdu: A Lexical Morphology Approach. Linguistics and Literature Review.

Sattler, R. (1996). Classical morphology and continuum morphology: opposition and continuum. Annals of Botany, 78(5), 577–581.

Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & cognition, 25(4), 425–437.

Slabakova, R. (2018). Inflectional morphology. The Handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition, 381–400.

Taylor, D. J. (1995). Classical linguistics: An overview. Concise History of the Language Sciences, 83–90.

Yahya, U., Arif, M., & Awan, S. (2023). A conceptual review of qualitative research inquiry in applied linguistics. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 620–633.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25