MYTHS AS PREDICTORS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD HIJRAS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACADEMICIANS AND STUDENTS IN PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Maida MS Scholar (Clinical Psychology), Department of Clinical Psychology, The Supervisor University Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Saira Majid (Corresponding Author) Head of Department Clinical Psychology, The Superior University Lahore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1976

Keywords:

myths, attitudes, hijras, transgender, academicians, students, Pakistan, social inclusion.

Abstract

In Pakistan the hijra population is subjected to serious social marginalization but little studies have been done to determine how cultural myths influence attitudes toward this group of people especially the educated sections of the population. The study was a cross-sectional, correlational study that examined the relationship between myths beliefs and attitudes toward hijras among academicians and students at Lahore and Sheikhupura, Pakistan. The sample size of 350 people (200 students, 150 academicians; 55.4% women) was used to conduct the Myths toward Hijras Scale (Jami and Kamal, 2017) and the Attitude toward Hijras Scale (Jami, 2012). It was established through multiple linear regression that myths had a strong correlation with attitudes towards hijras in students (t=.36, p =.001), which explained 28% of the variation. Independent samples t-tests showed that the differences between students and academicians in both myths (t = 4.96, p < .001) and attitudes (t = 3.11, p < .001) were significant with more negative myths and less positive attitudes supported by students. Gender differences were observed as male students expressed more positive attitudes as compared to female students (t = 4.12, p <.001). These results emphasize the essential influence of the cultural myths on the development of the attitude to the discriminated gender groups and indicate the necessity of specific educational interventions to eliminate the prejudices and encourage social integration.

References

Ahmed, U. (2014). Factors Affecting the Social Exclusion of Eunuchs (Hijras) in Pakistan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p2277

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Billard, T. J. (2018). Attitudes Toward Transgender Men and Women: Development and Validation of a New Measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00387

Chakrapani, V. (2010). Hijras/transgender women in India: HIV, human rights and social exclusion. New Delhi: UNDP.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118.

Gururaj, G. P., Manohar, J. S., & Rao, T. S. S. (2023). Attitudes and Opinions of the Teaching Faculty Toward the LGBT Community. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 5(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318221135716

Iqbal, M. (2017). Attachment styles, cognitive errors and social intelligence in transgender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Management and Technology, Lahore.

Jami, Dr. H., & Kamal, Dr. A. (2017). Myths about Hijras (Male-to-Female Transgender of Hijra Community)? Role of Gender and Commonly Held Belief about Them. Foundation University Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.33897/fujp.v1i1.60

Jami, H. (2012). Attitude toward Hijras Scale. Unpublished measure, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.

Jami, H., & Kamal, A. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward hijras in Pakistan: Gender and religiosity in perspective. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 30(1), 151-167.

Kalra, G., & Shah, N. (2013). The cultural, psychiatric, and sexuality aspects of hijras in India. International Journal of Transgenderism, 14(4), 171-181.

Khalil, J., Horgan, J., & Zeuthen, M. (2022). The attitudes-behaviors corrective (ABC) model of violent extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(3), 425-450.

Khan, F. A. (2014). Khwaja sīra: Transgender activism and transnationality in Pakistan. In South Asia in the world: An introduction (pp. 170-184). Routledge.

Nanda, S. (1990). Neither man nor woman: The hijras of India. Wadsworth Publishing.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.

Reddy, G. (2006). With respect to sex: Negotiating hijra identity in South India. Yoda Press.

Saeed, A., Mughal, U., & Farooq, S. (2018). It's complicated: Sociocultural factors and the disclosure decision of transgender individuals in Pakistan. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(8), 1051-1070.

Singh, H., & Kumar, P. (2020). Hijra: An understanding. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 15(1), 79-89.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

Trepte, S., & Loy, L. S. (2017). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28