“WE WILL FIGHT”: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF IMRAN KHAN'S KASHMIR SPEECH THROUGH VAN DIJK'S IDEOLOGICAL SQUARE

Authors

  • Rida Kamran MS English Linguistics Scholar, Abasyn University, Islamabad Campus Author
  • Saima Rehman M.Phil. English Linguistics Scholar, Riphah International University, Islamabad. Author
  • Roshan Aqdas MS English Linguistics Scholar, Abasyn University, Islamabad Campus Author
  • Nomana Anjum MS English Linguistics Scholar, Abasyn University, Islamabad Campus Author

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Van Dijk’s Ideological Square, Political Discourse, Imran Khan, Kashmir Speech, Ideology, Lexicalization, National Identity, Political Communication.

Abstract

Political speeches play an important role in shaping public opinion, promoting ideology, and constructing national identity. This study critically analyzes Imran Khan’s Kashmir speech, “We Will Fight,” using Teun A. van Dijk’s Ideological Square to examine how language constructs ideological polarization. The study aims to investigate how linguistic and discursive strategies create positive self-representation and negative other-representation, and how linguistic features such as lexicalization, modality, passivization, and intertextuality contribute to ideological construction. An interpretivist paradigm and a qualitative research design based on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) were employed. The data consist of an official excerpt from Imran Khan’s speech delivered at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) after India revokes Article 370 in August 2019. The findings reveal that the speech consistently portrays Pakistan and the Kashmiri people as peaceful, courageous, and morally justified, while India is represented as oppressive and the United Nations as ineffective in fulfilling its responsibilities. The analysis further shows that carefully selected lexical choices, modal expressions, religious references, historical analogies, and passivized structures strengthen persuasive communication and ideological polarization. These linguistic strategies construct a discourse of resistance, victimhood, justice, and international accountability. The study concludes that Imran Khan’s speech is a strategically organized ideological discourse that employs language to influence public perception, legitimize political positions, and reinforce national identity. By applying Van Dijk’s Ideological Square, the research contributes to Critical Discourse Analysis and political discourse studies by demonstrating how language functions as a powerful tool for persuasion and ideological representation in the context of the Kashmir conflict.

References

Ahmed, S., & Hashim, R. (2022). Political discourse and ideological representation in South Asian conflicts: A critical discourse perspective. Journal of Language and Politics, 21(3), 421–439.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Owais, M., Iqbal, S., & Ahmed, S. (2026). A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF EUPHEMISTIC LANGUAGE IN DONALD TRUMP’S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS 2026. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(1), 633-644.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Published

2026-07-03